Apart from metaphysics, logic and reason, epistemology and ethics ,there is also another branch of philosophy which is philosophy of “……” the dots are put into brackets because a philosopher chooses a peculiar discipline either politics, religion or science. A philosopher’s point of view or perception towards these vast topics helps in understanding the caliber of its systematic process, a crystal clear understanding of its content and concepts, the comparison and contraction it has with the other topics and its logical bond with philosophy in general. Mostly, philosophers minister the comparison of these three topics in order to see if they are decorous to each other. Often questions that arise from this field are, “ Is science and religion compatible? What is justice? What are the just limits of state authorities? How equally do they treat people?” Such are the questions; political, social and religious philosophers explore in depth and in length. These three topics simultaneously build up our believes, government and theoretical fields that we all question. With science, all hypothesis are theoretically proven, with politics, politicians leave no stone unturned from unveiling what their people need and question authorities for their rights and finally with religion, a state of believe and faith might be found by philosophers who seek to question different religions and their contents, which often vary from each other.
This just shows you how science and religion contradict one another. A task where philosophers try to examine the difference between the hypothesis and the actual theories.